Stephen A. Smith and the defense of Kiffin amid controversy
“People can kick rocks. I just don’t get it… I don’t care,” he stated, emphasizing his firm stance against criticisms labeling the coach as a pariah.
Smith highlighted that, in the past four years, very few coaches have achieved Kiffin’s numbers, and that his move to a prestigious program like LSU is a logical decision from any professional perspective.
The analyst also noted the pressure faced by the Rebels, who were forced to quickly appoint Pete Golding as head coach following Kiffin’s departure.

However, Stephen A. Smith insisted that the boos and questioning do not reflect the reality of the situation, and that often the narrative is shaped more by fan emotion than by the logic of strategic and family decisions.
Family, strategy, and Stephen A. Smith critical perspective
Beyond the professional aspect, Stephen A. Smith emphasized that Lane Kiffin’s decision also had a family component.
Moving to Baton Rouge not only represented a career advancement but also an improvement in quality of life for his wife and children—a detail rarely discussed in public debate.
According to Smith, understanding this factor is key to properly evaluating the situation and prevents judging Kiffin solely for his abrupt exit from Ole Miss.
Furthermore, Stephen A. Smith warned that media narratives can distort the perception of a successful coach, and that Kiffin has consistently shown the ability to overcome adversity throughout his career.
His analysis not only protects the coach’s reputation but also raises questions about how college programs and their fans react to unexpected strategic decisions.