Short numbers are part of Parsons’ Brand
Micah Parsons, on the other hand, has made short numbers part of his personal brand. He wore 11 at Penn State and in Dallas, and now he’s chosen 1 to mark a new chapter in Green Bay—the same number once worn by Packers founder Curly Lambeau. For many younger players, the shift represents style, identity, and freedom. But for Jason Kelce, it’s a loss of structure and meaning.
Jason Kelce reached a boiling point on a recent episode of the “New Heights” podcast when discussing the expanded jersey numbers the NFL made available to certain position groups in 2021. https://t.co/29BFGpItr3 pic.twitter.com/3EEJy4BaTE
— Irish Star US (@IrishStarUS) September 25, 2025
The tension between tradition and modernity isn’t new in the NFL. Since the rule change in 2021, several defensive players have opted for numbers that were once exclusive to offensive roles. The league, eager to adapt to a more visual and media-savvy generation, opened the door to personalization. And while Jason Kelce admits Micah Parsons “is a brutally good player,” he still mourns the fact that jersey numbers no longer say as much as they used to.
Tactical language
This debate isn’t just about aesthetics. It reflects how football is redefining its codes—from uniforms to branding. Parsons represents a new era: aggressive, versatile, and unafraid to break molds. Jason Kelce, meanwhile, defends a version of the NFL where numbers were almost a tactical language.
In truth, both have a point. But while Micah Parsons keeps racking up sacks and reshaping what a modern linebacker can be, Jason Kelce becomes the nostalgic voice of a generation that still believes the number on your back should tell a story. Even if that story now gets written in a different font.