A wide gap in numbers
The contrast between The Crawford vs Canelo and Jake Paul vs Tyson isn’t just about viewership—it’s about what each event represents. Crawford vs Canelo was pure boxing: legacy, technique, and respect. Paul vs Tyson leaned into spectacle, nostalgia, and viral appeal. The former was backed by Zuffa Boxing and fueled by Saudi Arabia’s sports push, while the latter was a Netflix and Most Valuable Promotions production, built more for entertainment than competition.
Ver esta publicación en Instagram
Fan reactions were as split as the styles of The Crawford vs Canelo and Jake Paul vs Tyson. Some hailed Terence vs Saul as “the best fight since Mayweather vs Pacquiao.” Others admitted that the Mike Tyson name and Paul’s digital reach created a magnetism that’s hard to match. On social media, many pointed out that “real boxing can still draw crowds,” but also that “spectacle sells more than skill.”
Two heavyweight stories
Jake Paul vs Mike Tyson marked the return of the former heavyweight champion after his 2020 exhibition against Roy Jones Jr. Though the fight leaned more toward media buzz than competitive edge, its pop culture impact was undeniable. In contrast, The Terence Crawford vs Canelo Alvarez bout was a masterclass in boxing, with historical implications that go far beyond clicks.
The uncomfortable but necessary question now hangs in the air: can boxing survive if what gets watched most isn’t what’s best fought? Because while the numbers favor Jake Paul vs Tyson, the respect still belongs to Canelo and Crawford.